Monday, April 27, 2009
Literary Los Angeles
Recently I've put this theory into question. The Los Angeles Times Festival of Books was held this past weekend on UCLA's campus. I was not only surprised that the event was being thrown, but who knew thousands of bibliophiles would flock in. Of course the authors, rare books, and book accessories (like book jackets) will be a draw for some, but last year over 130,000 people attended.
Still, one festival does not a book town make. Many attendees probably came from other areas, and this is only one weekend a year. Any town this size should be able to get attendance up for one literary event a year.
But following that thought, I realized LA does have some interesting draws for bookworms. So many interesting authors wrote from or about Los Angeles; one of my personal favorites is Ray Bradbury, who also wrote a great article about a great bookstore in Long Beach (which closed last year). Now that I live in Los Angeles, I have so much fun reading Phillip Marlowe (2nd only to Sherlock Holmes) stories, all of which take place in LA. That's not to mention all the libraries LA has to offer. The Central Library just happens to be my favorite place in the entire city. It is so beautiful! Yesterday I had the chance to visit the Santa Monica library and I was really surprised at everything it has to offer.
It might take a little extra effort to find, but LA can offer a reader a great experience.
Monday, April 20, 2009
Changes in Los Angeles
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
What's Good for the Getty?
The arts are an important staple to Los Angeles, and the struggles going on at The Getty mean that other venues will be having difficulties as well. This probably isn’t a huge surprise’ during tough economic times, donations drastically drop. This is especially true for the arts. When wallets start getting thinner, supporting the arts becomes a lower priority. For this reason, venues around LA are struggling to keep their operations at the usual high level.
Not just the fine arts are taking a hit; in November, the Music Center in Los Angeles announced cancellations for its summer schedule due to a lack of funds. The Nederlands Dance Theater I will have to wait until the economy improves before they can play Los Angeles.
Film Festivals, which have been growing in popularity in my recent memory, have been closing. Although it may be partially due to the recent overabundance of festivals (note my reference to their rising popularity), the process of weeding out the unecessaries (like New Jersey's Wildwood by the Sea Film Festival) has certainly been sped up by the lack of extra capital floating around.
A quick read of the Silence Dogetty blog shows what the typical US worker feels about reductions in their own workplace. After a first round of layoffs last year, accompanied by a December email expressing the intention of future layoffs, a group of employees created this anonymous forum to articulate their feelings on the unfair working conditions at the Getty. According to James M. Wood, the Getty Trust’s President, the cuts were not a money saving measure but an effort to “reallocate” resources.
So what are the money saving measures? The chief investment officer is focusing on liquidity, lowering investment in expensive projects and neglecting to purchase assets that will be hard to move out later. Basically, this comes down to a minimization on temporary exhibitions and fewer additions to the museum.
Silence Dogetty has another suggestion: lowering the salaries of its highest executives. The newest poll shows that the voters agree,
20% on $500k plus, 15% for $300 - 499K, 10% on $100 - 299K: 81 (67%)
10% on all exempt salaries only: 8 (6%)
5% on all non-exempt and exempt salaries: 11 (9%)
No salary reductions: 20 (16%)
Considering that those who visit the blog are most likely sensitive to staff cuts at the Getty, these results are not surprising. It is even less surprising in the context of the US right now; the trend seems to be toward a redistribution of wealth.
One thing I love about the way the Getty and its staff are dealing with the crisis is never once suggesting a raise in prices. Though visiting the Getty Villa is currently free of charge, no one has yet brought up the possibility of a new entrance fee. The admission fee at the Getty Museum has never been mentioned as flexible. In these times, it is more important than ever to include those from all walks of life in the arts.
Despite the downturn in the economy, art fairs and promotions continue on. Three SoCal art fairs occurred in January alone. The feel of these events may be moving a bit from buying to speculating, but attendance remains high. According to Stephen Cohen, an L.A. Photography dealer, "It's a buyer's market. We expect a big turnout, but it might be that a lot of people are looking, holding on to their money or getting an idea of what to buy when they have some to spend."
Film festivals aren’t dying out either. Despite cutbacks, all sponsors will be returning to this year’s Los Angeles Film Festival. The Los Angeles Music Center received the largest ever donation to support dance in the US. Although the economy has lowered the importance of the arts on the priority lists of many, the donor, Ms. Glorya Kaufman, found inspiration in our situation for her donation. "It's the perfect time," Kaufman said, "because everyone is starting to get into the doldrums. They're not spending money, not doing this, not doing that. What this does is, we can have music on the Music Center courtyard, we can have little bands and people learning to dance. . . . Everyone is happy dancing."
This is a very interesting approach to the recession. It’s hard for me to decide how I feel about it- on the one hand, $20 million could go pretty far in providing jobs, feeding the hungry, or other stereotypically noble pursuits. On the other hand, I have to agree that the recession will be much easier to weather if people are dancing.
Monday, March 9, 2009
So where do I live now?
I've gotten a bit frustrated n the past, when friends are incapable of telling me where a restaurant is. "It's in, I don't know... Silverlake?" Los Angeles is too sprawling and too varied to be considered one unit; it needs to be broken up. Lines must be drawn and labels must be applied. That is just LA.
Who knows if the plan will work or if the names will stick, but getting directions will sure be a lot easier if it does.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Voting results!
The two measure mentioned in this article, E and B, are of a little more interest to me. Measure E would have increased the city council's ability to use money to provide incentives attracting new businesses to Los Angeles. While bringing in more jobs is certainly important, I don't think raising taxes at the expense of current businesses is the correct way to do it.
Measure B was designed to increase funding for increasing the infrastructure for solar power in Los Angeles. The LA Times credits the loss to the fact that the bill would have favored work by utility as opposed to by local businesses.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Theater re-vamp

I am actually really excited about this project, an initiative to revitalize the theater district downtown. I always get a little nostalgic when I walk there, funny since I wasn't around yet when the theaters were still open. But the theaters continue to stand, unoccupied or being used as small stores.
Bringing Broadway Back is aiming to put these building back to their original use. The plans look pretty amazing- the Eastern Building downtown has become my favorite and these seem to be going along with that feel. A few weeks ago the project organized a walk along Broadway, and I am looking forward to getting feedback on the project's progress.
If you want to get involved, check out the above link or the Facebook group.
My favorite thing about the project? It looks like it's working with downtown, not trying to cover it up. All the storefronts will be facing the street, the word "high-class" has never been thrown around in reference to the apartments that will be placed above the theater, and they are already getting the community involved. Very exciting!
Monday, February 23, 2009
LA Live
I will admit; every time I go downtown I am as transfixed by the bright lights of the new Nokia Center as anyone. I stop at the light at Figueroa and 11th and get a little excited at the neon glow emitted into the straight. That being said, it's always a little bit awkward; you really have to crane your neck to get a solid glimpse of the area. Now that new storefronts are opening along Figueroa, it is starting to feel a little more connected to the area, but it remains clear that the idea of LA Live is not to draw people into downtown. LA Live is meant to draw people into LA Live, and get them to stay there for as long as possible.
Keeping itself at a distance from downtown might not be a bad thing, but I feel like it is a missed opportunity. The one thing LA Live had going for it, as opposed to other destination shopping areas like The Grove or Universal Citywalk, the Nokia Center is just a few minutes walk from myriad restaurants, stores, cafes, libraries, and businesses. By keeping themselves separate from downtown they might be ensuring that their customers do not wander off to another area, but they are also effectively guaranteeing that no one will wander in on a day spend downtown. Perhaps the idea is that few like to pass their days here; while it is true that some might not feel comfortable walking the streets of downtown, many might if they had one safe, central location with which to start or end. Keeping an avenue toward downtown open might have been an effective way to benefit both LA live and downtown. Now it is just one of an Angelino's many options instead of something new.
While the ease of parking will certainly feel like a blessing to many who visit, it is just another way to keep from becoming involved with the city. You can drive downtown, park, and never see anything off the main street. This could create yet another potential problem with the new opening: traffic. Maybe I am the only one who has noticed, but traffic downtown was already horrible on game days. Imagine now that not only sporting events, but concerts and shows are going on a few times a week. Increased traffic is not only going to encourage patrons to ignore downtown, but to discourage it's regulars from continuing to visit. The city of Los Angeles did require the developers to use some of their budget to help offset the effects of increased traffic of the area (widening on and off ramps, posting signs to warn travellers of the increased traffic in the downtown area) but this will only serve to lessen the effects, not override them.
Another disadvantage to inserting LA Live into downtown is the increased cost of housing for current residents. Luxury housing is being placed above the venues at the Nokia Center, and is going in around it as well. Expensive housing rarely coexists next to the cheap and affordable. Funding that many hoped would go toward creating affordable housing for the lower classes was instead put to use revitalizing the "Figueroa Corridor." The affordability of home in the downtown area had already become a bit of a problem, but this new development is pretty shameless in its lack of attempts to accommodate those it is displacing.
However, L.A. Live does have the potential to do some good things for the surrounding area. Downtown has never been much of a draw for tourists; though there are several attractions that many would enjoy visiting, it is not incredibly welcoming to outsiders. The mess of one-way streets and familiar restaurant names keeps many from venturing in that direction. L.A. Live might be just what the doctor ordered to get the streets bustling again. The neon lights will brighten up the area, making it feel a little safer, if incredibly more commercial. Many have suggested it might end up a bit like Times Square in New York City; a place for tourists that a local might go on occasion, but only rarely. The parade of swanky chain restaurants will more than likely begin to feel tiresome to the seasoned Angelino, but those here for a only a brief time will appreciate the slight sense of adventure they get from eating out in Los Angeles while avoiding the possibility of picking a bad place.
At the very least, this will bring more tourists downtown. While they are there, it is very likely they will be more willing to explore the downtown sights they would not normally have made time for. This can bring in more revenue to the area that it has previously been missing. It is entirely possible that this gradual attraction of visitors will slowly add to the reputation of downtown until tourism becomes a large source of revenue for the area. While I am not itching for it to become another Hollywood, with streets lined with kitsch-y shops with murals depicting celebrities on every wall, bringing money in to the community has the potential to benefit a wide range of people.
At this point, it is hard to say what the long term effects of the Nokia Center will be on downtown LA. But despite my official controversial stance on this development, I have to admit: I am pretty excited. As I said, I already enjoy driving by it, and construction hasn't even completed yet. The thing that thrills me most is probably the movie theaters going in- theaters here are few and far between. The options now are one with three screens in the University Village, the AMC Magic Johnson on Crenshaw, and the Laemmele Grand with four screens downtown. For a city famous for its connection to the movie business, it is a little difficult to actually find a place to view those movies. It is unlikely I will be wiling to pay their high prices for a run of the mill movie, it will be nice to have the option of seeing something I am really interested in without driving for an hour.
Aside from the benefits of a new movie theater, I feel pretty strongly that the glamour of L.A. Live will not take long to wear off. For a while the idea of bowling at LuckyStrike will seem exciting, but soon the reality of enforcing a dress code at a bowling will be realized for the absurdity that it is. The next time I have family visiting I will be tempted to take them to The Yardhouse, but after that I will probably feel the need to take them somewhere that isn't flooded with other tourists. Soon it will be just another piece of Los Angeles that I drive by on my way down Fig.